Wednesday, October 28, 2009

Uncomfortable Joy

On Tuesday, I spent a lovely half hour or so speaking with a local television reporter. The reason for the conversation was an announcement I had made to my congregation just a few days prior. It was the announcement that I will refuse to sign any and all marriage licenses until marriage equality becomes a reality in California. When I made this announcement to my congregation, and in the many months of deep reflection that led to my decision, I hadn't thought about it being particularly newsworthy.


I have been interviewed a few times in the past year when the Prop 8 issue was hot and heavy. I traveled to the state capital and testified before lawmakers on behalf of the couples and families whose lives and relationships were being threatened. I spoke at a rally after the election when so many of us, gay and straight alike, were trying to copy with the pain of loss. Most recently, I agreed to serve on a statewide Marriage Equality Leadership Team steering committee. That is when I began to examine and question my actions as someone with the authority and power to sign marriage licenses; to validate a relationship between two loving individuals.

My decision to announce my personal 'protest' was not made lightly. As I shared with my congregation, taking the step out of my comfort zone wasn't easy by any stretch of the imagination. But the risk I took in making such a decision, and then making such a public announcement, pales in comparison with others who have taken risks to stand on the side of love.

The news reporter seems to think that this is indeed an important story to share and I am grateful for his interest. I can only hope that I made it clear to him, as well as to others with whom I've shared my decision, that my primary motive was not to change minds about marriage equality. I realize that may sound odd, but it was not my primary motive. If, as a result of my decision and perhaps as a result of someone hearing about it through this television interview, minds are changed, that would be a wonderful benefit. But my primary motive was about integrity and authenticity.

I was ordained as a minister in the Unitarian Universalist faith. It is a faith tradition with an incredibly rich heritage and history of women and men who have taken risks to speak out against injustice and who have taught me that compassion and respect are values to be lived and shared. That faith calls me to stand on the side of love. It does not call me to sit on the sidelines in my rocking chair of comfort. I am called to stand on the side of love no matter how difficult or uncomfortable it might be. How can I live my faith fully and answer that call if I continue to sign marriage licenses as an agent of a state that practices discrimination and oppression? Simply said, I cannot.


There is joy in my decision, as uncomfortable as it was to make it, and as uncomfortable as it may prove to be in the coming months. I know that there will be couples who will go elsewhere for an marriage officiant, either because of the inconvenience of having the county clerk sign their license or because they do not agree that all of our brothers and sisters deserve marriage equality. I know that there will be some members of my congregation who will disagree with my decision. There is another truth that I know. That truth says that in order to be true to my call as a Unitarian Universalist minister I need to walk the talk and take a stand.


I choose to stand on the side of love. I choose the uncomfortable joy.

4 comments:

  1. Nice blog; and you're a good writer - very visual. Your decision must have been a tough call knowing that it will impact innocents who simply want to be married by their minister. But perhaps there are no "innocents" and its a moot point. It's a risk and there is always risk, either taken or ignored. Without risk nothing is gained of course and much can be lost. Little you in little Santee standing on the side of love - and the expression of love. I feel for the people who cannot be married and I feel for the people who will have to be married by a stranger. Standing up is never easy but sometimes, well, sometimes you just have to stand up.
    Miles

    ReplyDelete
  2. Good on you, Reverand for your stand on gay marriage. Est illagitamus non carborundum est.

    James Conner
    Jamul, CA

    ReplyDelete
  3. I'm not a religious man by any means, but I still wanted to voice my husband and I's gratitude to your personal and professional stance for equal protections and civil rights to all individuals.

    I can't imagine the fall out from such a public stance will be easy to deal with, but I know there are many out there thankful for the act.

    Sam
    San Diego, CA

    ReplyDelete
  4. It seems to me that legal marriage is a government issue, while spiritual marriage is a deeply personal issue. Churches being involved in marriage rites don't make them legal. They can be legal without a minister being involved. That is why it confounds me that the government can uphold what has basically become a religious argument that legalizing marriage between two same sexed loving adults is immoral.

    If some churches refuse to acknowledge same sex marriage bonds, that's their right. But I don't see how it is in the best interests of the state to deny marriages to loving couples. Families make our society stronger and more stable, no matter what sexes are involved.You have every right in the world to take a moral stand Kathleen, and I'm proud of you.

    I find it ironic that 30 years ago, when I called a UU church in Santa Barbara to ask if Mike and I could be married by their minister (I had been raised a UU) I was told "No, not unless you are a member of the church." !!

    ReplyDelete